Legal Opinion

Lapique v. Agoure

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 11, 1921No. Civ. No. 3618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff to recover the sum of $175,000 for false imprisonment.

Demurrers by the various defendants were interposed to plaintiff’s second amended complaint, which were sustained without leave to amend, and judgment of dismissal followed. The present appeal is from such judgment.

Plaintiff appeared in the court below and does here in propria persona. It is manifest that he is not an attorney at law, and, in fact, his pleading so admits. The amended complaint contains some sixty-four allegations, in addition to which eleven additional causes of action are attempted to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Going v. DinwiddieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Donati v. RighettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barrier v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. Malone v. CareyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Foerst v. HobroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Jones v. GreenIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Yancey v. BrennemanDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API