Legal Opinion

Garford Trucking, Inc. v. United States

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 2, 1946No. Civ. A. No. 4263PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORMAN, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Garford Trucking, Incorporated, is a motor carrier. On October 1, 1938, the Interstate Commerce Commission on its “grandfather” application (Docket Mc-1091) pursuant to 49 U.S.C.A. § 306(a), granted it a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing the transportation of general commodities, with certain exceptions, over irregular routes (9 M.C.C. 672).

On March 23, 1939, the Commission, upon the petition of certain protestants, set aside its order of October 1, 1938 and reopened the whole matter for oral argument and reconsideration. On…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Fansteel Metallurgical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Alton Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Malone Freight Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1952
  2. T. I. McCormack Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southwest Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1949
  4. Cape Air Freight, Inc., a Corporation v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Pinto Trucking Service, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API