Legal Opinion
Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 1, 1990No. C0-89-2181PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MULALLY, EDWARD D„ Acting Judge.
On August 1, 1989, the trial court ordered summary judgment, finding Crosstown Bell and Alfred Teien to be liable under a contract for deed to George and Dorothy Chergosky for $97,850.65 plus interest. The trial court also ruled the Cher-goskys, as a matter of law, had first priority to a lump sum of money held by the trial court, over the claims of Robert Griffith and the law firm of Katz, Davis & Manka, Ltd. (KDM). Crosstown, Teien and Griffith appeal; KDM does not.
FACTS
On December 13, 1971, Crosstown Bell was incorporated by Alfred Teien to do…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Victoria Elevator Co. of Minneapolis v. Meriden Grain Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- West Concord Conservation Club, Inc. v. ChilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Halverson v. Schuster (In Re Schuster)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. RossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994