Standridge v. City of Hot Springs
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellants, husband and wife, owned urban property in Hot Springs, on which were situated cabins containing eleven residential rental units. The cabins were allowed to fall into such disrepair that the city, assertedly after having given lawful notice of its intentions, demolished the cabins as being substandard and unfit for human habitation. The appellants brought this action against the city to recover $40,000 as compensation “for the unlawful destruction of their property.”
At the close of all the proof the trial judge directed a verdict for the city on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ryan Distributing Corporation v. CaleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Marilyn Agnes Cortez, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph M. Cortez v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Bush v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. WoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Cy Carney Appliance Co. v. TrueSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- McClina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Tester v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Lytle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Stacks v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.