Legal Opinion

In re Claim of King

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1980No. 79-1510PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the requirement of R. C. 4141.28(0) that a party appealing to the *88Court of Common Pleas timely file a copy of his notice of appeal with all interested parties is a mandatory and jurisdictional requirement. R. C. 4141.28(0) provides, in relevant part:

“Any interested party may, within thirty days after notice of the decision of the board was mailed to the last known post office address of all interested parties, appeal from the decision of the board to the court of common pleas of the county wherein, the appellant, if an employee, is resident or has his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Zier v. Bureau of Unemployment CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Jenkins v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Todd v. GarnesOhio Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sun Refining & Marketing Co. v. BrennanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Graham v. City of Lakewood, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Dikong v. Ohio Supports, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Ohio Multi-Use Trails Ass'n v. Vinton County CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Nord Community Mental Health Center v. County of LorainOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API