Legal Opinion

Krmicek v. Federal Life Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 26, 1929No. Gen. No. 33,112PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barnes

This is an action in assumpsit brought by plaintiff as beneficiary against the defendant on an accident insurance policy for $7,500," and interest, for accidental death of plaintiff’s husband. A demurrer to the declaration was sustained, and plaintiff electing to stand by the same the cause was dismissed at plaintiff’s costs and she has appealed.

The policy is set out at length in the declaration. It contains the standard and optional standard provisions provided for by statute. Cahill’s St., ch. 73, lili 469, 470. One of said optional provisions reads as follows:

“20. The insurance under this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Metzger v. . &198tna Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Moest v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Partridge v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Polzin v. Phoenix of Hartford InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  2. Watkins v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. Bay Trust Co. v. Agricultural Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. United Life & Accident Insurance v. BraffmanConnecticut Superior Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API