Legal Opinion

United Life & Accident Insurance v. Braffman

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided October 19, 1936No. File #49585Published

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This case was submitted on the admitted allegations of the complaint, the second prayer for relief being withdrawn in open court. The plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment as to the rights of the defendant under a clause in its policy reading as follows:

“The insurance under this policy shall not cover any person under the age of 15 years nor over the age of 60 years. Any premiums paid to the Company for any period not covered by this policy will be returned upon request.”

While the defendant cites one case in point (Moest vs. Continental Casualty Co., 55 Misc. (N. Y.) 128), the quotation is a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. United States Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  2. Krmicek v. Federal Life InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API