Scibelli v. Pennsylvania Railroad
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion bt
Me. Justice Musmanno :
The Majority Opinion treats this case as if the plaintiff Frank A. Scibelli were an adult. In point of fact, of course, he was at the time of the accident involved only seven years of age. And it is a matter of gratification, if not pride, that the laws of this enlightened country are intelligently moulded in statute and court decision to take cognizance of the immaturity of thought, the impulsiveness of movement and the lack of serious reflection in children of tender age.
The argument in the Majority Opinion sweeps like an express train over a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Hall v. VanderpoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Hawk v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Hydraulic Works Co. v. OrrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.