Legal Opinion

McNeill v. Conyers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 16, 1908No. 6962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Klugh, J., Clarendon, July, 1907. Action by J. T. McNeill against Preston Conyers. From Circuit order affirming judgment of Magistrate J. S. Sellers, plaintiff appeals. cites :An agricultural lien is but a contract and should be so construe:d 39 S. W., 3; 108 Fed., 171.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The plaintiff advanced to the defendant $26.25, under an agricultural lien and chattel mortgage, dated 12th March, 1904, providing for the extension of credit by the plaintiff, in these words : “That the party of the first part agrees to make advances of money or supplies to the party of the second part, who is engaged in the cultivation of the soil on his own land, containing thirteen acres, and four acres on Charlie Welch’s, joining W. T. Beard and Charlie Welch’s farm, in said county and State, from time to time during the current…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spears v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1905

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BarnettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  2. Rigby v. GaymonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API