Legal Opinion

In Re JM

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1991No. 90-183Published

1Opinion of the Court

596 A.2d 961 (1991)

In re J.M., Appellant.

No. 90-183.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Argued December 19, 1990.

Decided September 6, 1991.

C. Edward Shacklee, appointed by the court, for appellant.

Charlotte M. Brookins, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom Herbert O. Reid, Corp. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, and Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee District of Columbia.

Jay B. Stephens, U.S. Atty., and John R. Fisher and Shanlon Wu, Asst. U.S. Attys., filed a brief amicus curiae for the U.S.

Before SCHWELB and FARRELL, Associate Judges, and MACK,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API