Legal Opinion

City of Hattiesburg v. Cobb Bros. Const. Co.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1935No. 31854PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Appellee filed its bill in the chancery court of Forrest county against appellant to' recover the sum of two thousand five hundred dollars, and for discovery in aid thereof. Appellant answered the bill, and embodied in its answer grounds of demurrer separately set out as authorized by section 378, Code 1930. The demurrer was overruled, and an appeal granted to settle the principles of the cause.

The bill charged, in substance, the following facts: That on September 12, 1929, appellant advertised for bids from contractors for the construction of certain sewer lines in the city. That appellee,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Washington v. SoriaMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Bessler Movable Stairway Co. v. Bank of LeakesvilleMississippi Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Masonic Benefit Ass'n v. First State BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Milam v. PaxtonMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Cock v. AbernathyMississippi Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Rushlight Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. First Nat. Bank of Laurel v. JohnsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Berkeley Unified School Dist. of Alameda County v. James I. Barnes Const. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API