Legal Opinion

Stearns Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 5, 2002No. 594-89 LPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Senior Judge.

Introduction

Plaintiff originally owned valuable coal, which it intended to mine. It also owned the surface land. After selling the surface land to the federal government in 1937, reserving its coal and mineral rights, plaintiff continued to mine the property for many years. In doing this it complied with all federal and state mining and environmental regulations. Under Kentucky law, coal is a dominant estate. This means that the coal owner has the right to mine, with underground mines, despite the wishes of the surface owner. In fact, the surface owner must take no…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. The Stearns Company, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  2. Bassett, New Mexico LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
  3. Ag-Innovations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  4. Innovair Aviation, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  5. Robert A. Luciano, Jr., Trustee of the Robert A. Luciano Jr. Revocable Trust Dated February 27, 1995 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API