Legal Opinion
Bausch & Lomb Optical Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 1, 1954No. 36, Docket 23053PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
Bausch & Lomb Optical Company petitions us to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board holding it guilty of violating §§ 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 158(a) (1) and 158(a) (3), and directing it to reinstate four employees with reimbursement of lost pay. The Board found that the petitioner company had illegally interfered with union organization through threats of economic reprisal and coercive interrogation of its employees. It also found that the four employees had been discharged or not reinstated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Express Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- May Department Stores Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Joy Silk Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Dinion Coil Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Precision Fabricators, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- The Powers Regulator Company, an Illinois Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, Powers Employees Shop Union v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Bausch & Lomb Optical Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954