Legal Opinion

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Percy Mark MIGUEL, Defendant-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1997No. 95-10033PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

Percy Mark Miguel appeals his jury conviction of two counts of abusive sexual contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(1). Miguel’s primary contention is that the district court’s procedure for taking the eleven-year-old victim’s videotaped deposition violated 18 U.S.C. § 3509 as well as Miguel’s Sixth Amendment rights to confrontation of witnesses and assistance of counsel. The fatal defect in the procedure, according to Miguel, is that it failed to afford him the “means of private, contemporaneous communication” with his counsel that the statute guarantees,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Nicholas MiddletonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Way Quoe LongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Peter James HollerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Hans BOOS, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API