Legal Opinion

Remainders, Inc. v. Bartlett

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 19, 1963No. Civ. 26669PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff, as assignee of the law firm of Guerin & Guerin, filed this action against defendant to recover attorneys’ fees, court costs and miscellaneous fees advanced in a number of legal matters which that firm had handled for defendant, and also sought to foreclose a lien on certain real property which was alleged to have been given as security for the payment of said fees and advances. Defendant defaulted and the ease was tried as a default.

The complaint alleges four causes of action: (1) an open book account; (2) in quantum meruit-, (3) an account stated; and (4) foreclosure of a lien on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Watson v. HobsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Estate of De BarryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Magee v. BrennemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Landes Construction Co., Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Royal Bank of Canada, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Bonaccorso v. KaplanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API