Legal Opinion

Jones v. William Buick, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 3, 2003No. 1-01-1568 RelPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY

The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) (815 ILCS 505/2C (West 1996)) mandates that a prospective merchandise purchaser seeking credit approval from the seller must receive a complete refund of any down payment made if her credit application is rejected. The Act, however, does not dictate a period within which this refund must occur.

In the instant appeal, the parties dispute whether an automobile dealer’s delay of approximately three weeks in issuing a refund raises a sufficient inference of improper conduct under the Act and under common law fraud principles to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Washington Courte Condominium Association-Four v. WASHINGTON-GOLF CORPORATIONAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Quality Lighting, Inc. v. BenjaminAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Sullivan's Wholesale Drug Co. v. Faryl's Pharmacy, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Hayman v. Autohaus on Edens, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCabe v. Crawford & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
  2. Huss v. Sessler Ford, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Owners Insurance Co. v. Don McCue Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  4. Frazier v. Castle Ford, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Huss v. Sessler Ford Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API