Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Rutgers

New Jersey Tax Court

Decided August 1, 2008Published

1Opinion of the Court

MENYUK, J.T.C.

Defendants Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, and the Trastees of Rutgers College (collectively, “Rutgers”) have moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to R. 4:6-2. Defendant Township of Piseataway (“Township”) joins in the motion. For the reasons that follow, I conclude that Rutgers’ motion should be granted.

The complaint seeks to invalidate for tax year 2008 the exemption from local propei’ty taxation that has been granted to several apartment buildings owned by Rutgers and devoted to housing Rutgers’…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
  3. Paper Mill Playhouse v. Millburn TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Rutgers v. PilusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
  5. Boys' Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Township of JeffersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API