Legal Opinion

Allen v. Merchants Fire Assurance Corp. New York

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1934No. 25055. En BancPublished

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

These actions were brought to recover upon certain fire insurance policies. The cases were consolidated for trial below, and by stipulation have been consolidated for the purposes of this appeal. Trial was had to a jury, resulting in verdicts favorable to plaintiffs; and from judgments on the verdicts, the defendant insurance companies have appealed.

The assignments of error principally relied upon question the ruling of the trial court in denying a challenge to the sufficiency of the respondents’ evidence, denying a motion for an instructed verdict, and denying the motion for judgment n. o. v.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bodine v. . Exchange Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Steele v. German InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. HookSupreme Court of Virginia · 1931
  4. Bennett v. Council Bluffs Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Barone v. Aetna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API