Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sheffield

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided July 8, 1983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Sheffield, after waiver of indictments, was tried in the Superior Court for rape, sodomy, kidnapping, and assault by means of a dangerous weapon on complaints originally issued by a District Court. At a first trial (which began on October 29, 1979) before a Superior Court judge and a jury, a mistrial was declared upon motion of defense trial counsel because the judge thought that the prosecutor was violating the principle declared in Commonwealth v. Soares, 377 Mass. 461, 491-492, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 881 (1979) , by inappropriate use of peremptory challenges. At a second trial before a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SoaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. RodriguezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. DouganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. WhiteheadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JewettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. McWhinneyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. HuntMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  4. Commonwealth v. PudderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  5. Sheffield v. CurranDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API