Christenson v. Paulus

This is a challenge by one who does not favor passage of the measure which was the subject of our decision today in Ferry v. Paulus, 297 Or 70, 682 P2d 262 (1984). This petitioner urges that the Attorney General’s provided title, which we have set forth verbatim in Ferry v. Paulus, supra, is insufficient because it fails to convey certain effects of passage of the measure and is unfair because the title

“misleads voters about the effect of the measure on existing comprehensive plans and zoning. It states local plans and zoning ‘remain.’ It is the requirement to plan and zone, not the plans and…