Legal Opinion

State v. Sheppard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 13, 1996No. 95-KK-0370PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

679 So.2d 899 (1996)

STATE of Louisiana

v.

Robert SHEPPARD.

No. 95-KK-0370.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 13, 1996.

2Per curiam

The record fully supports the district court's ruling that relator did not have a viable defense of insanity based on long-term substance abuse and that the failure of appointed counsel to discuss the defense with him had no bearing on the voluntariness of his guilty plea. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 55, 106 S.Ct. 366, 370, 88 L.Ed.2d 203 (1985); State v. Washington, 491 So.2d 1337, 1338-39 (La.1986).

The record also shows, however, that relator had no opportunity to discuss…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Michael Lee SammonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. Laferriere v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. State v. FrickeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. State v. JenkinsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. State v. MageeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API