Legal Opinion

Hull v. Croft

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 13, 1907No. Gen. No. 4,786PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Assumpsit. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Grundy county; the Hon. Samuel C. Stough, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Appellant began this suit February 5, 1904, to recover of appellee damages for breach of contract in repudiating and refusing to carry out a contract of lease of appellant’s farm in Brule county, South Dakota. The declaration sets up the making of a lease on February 1, 1903, by which Hull leases to Croft land described as the “N. E. ¼, 2-68-103, N. E. ¼ and S. ½, 1-68-103, N. W. ¼, 7-67-103, and N. W. ¼, 12-68-103, Brule county, S. D.,” from the first day of April, 1904, to the first day of April, 1907, at an annual rental of $627.30, payable one-half October 1 and one-half March 1 of each…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marske v. WillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Clark v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Dougherty v. PurdyIllinois Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Paris v. LewisIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Farwell Construction Co. v. TicktinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Stonecipher v. PillatschAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Leazzo v. DunhamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API