Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. East Coast Lumber & Supply Co. v. Lee

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 16, 1937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P. J.

The alternative writ of mandamus herein issued by this court against the State Comptroller as respondent, alleges that the relator, the East Coast Lumber & Supply Company, owns and operates ten lumber yards in this State; that the character of the business done by relator in said lumber yards is a retail and wholesale lumber business, that relator’s retail lumber business, together with the retail sale of other building materials made at and in said lumber yards, was on December 1, 1936, held by the Supreme Court of Florida to be subject to Chapter 16848, Laws of Florida, 1935; that relator…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Trust Co. v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. State Ex Rel. Lane Drug Stores, Inc. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Mason Lumber Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. Power v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Hamel v. MarlowMississippi Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Newsweek, Inc. v. Department of RevenueDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Dade County v. MortonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API