Legal Opinion

Hamel v. Marlow

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1934No. 31352PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages on the dissolution of an injunction. Hamel, Sealy, and Ganong each separately owned and conducted a billiard and pool hall in Sunflower county, on each of which the sheriff and tax collector was attempting to collect the privilege tax due thereon under chapter 89, Laws of 1932. Whereupon they filed a joint bill of complaint against the sheriff and tax collector, setting forth separate ownership of the three billiard and pool halls, the privilege tax that would become due thereon under the statute which they alleged violated certain sections…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Broadhead v. MonaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Fischer Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. Iowa State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  3. State v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  4. McCaw Keating v. Tax Com'r FaseHawaii Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Texas Co. v. DyerMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API