Humphrey v. Brown
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Motion to Strike Out Portions of Amended Complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtHawley, District Judge
(orally). This is an action to recover damages for breach of promise of marriage. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendant represented to plaintiff that he was “very rich, and worth over $1,000,000.” It is further alleged in the complaint “that the representations and statements of said defendant concerning his being very rich are, as plaintiff believes, not wholly false, and that defendant is and was at all the times herein mentioned * * * possessed in his own right of property of the value of about $250,000.” The defendant moves to strike out the averments…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kniffen v. . McConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Chellis v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Jackson v. KittleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1890
- Reed v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Allen v. . BakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.