Legal Opinion

Bank of Luverne v. Turk

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 23, 1930No. 3 Div. 917PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

Appellant, as a judgment creditor of E. J. Turk, by this proceeding, seeks to redeem his land from a mortgage to an insurance company. The land is a large tract which embraces the homestead of the mortgagor. The judgment is no lien upon the homestead.

The decree of the circuit court permitted a redemption only of the land not exempt, but required the payment of the entire mortgage debt. This would have the effect of relieving the homestead from the lien of the mortgage. But it is said that complainant cannot redeem the homestead because it has no lien on it, and that in effecting a redemption…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGuire v. Van PeltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Lehman, Durr & Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Lyon v. PowellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Griffith v. VentressSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Sims v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Citizens Walgreen Drug Agency, Inc. v. Gulf InsuranceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Howell v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Gibson v. Farmers and Merchants BankDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API