Anthony Robinson, Jr. v. CAR MAX AUTO FINANCE, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY ROBINSON, JR., No. 2:26-cv-01654-DC-SCR 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CAR MAX AUTO FINANCE, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter, which is referred to the undersigned pursuant 18 to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to 19 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted a declaration listing his income and 20 expenses and averring an inability to pay the costs of this proceeding. The motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.