Legal Opinion
Apuzzo v. Kobuta, No. Cv 93-0344031 (Jan. 14, 1997)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 14, 1997No. Nos. CV 93-0344031, CV 93-0342999Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT In these consolidated cases, the plaintiffs are police officers who allege that the were injured by the defendant as he attempted to interfere with them as they were arresting his father. The defendant has moved for summary judgment, claiming that the firefighter's rule as articulated in Furstein v. Hill,218 Conn. 610 (1991), precludes recovery by the plaintiffs and entitles the defendant to judgment as a matter of law.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Dini v. NaiditchIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.