Legal Opinion

Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Rainboldt

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 4, 1931No. 1036PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.

Appellee, I. N. Rainboldt, for himself individually and as next friend for his six year old girl, instituted this suit against appellants, Dr. Pepper Bottling Conrpany, a corporation, Henry Schroeder and E. A., Graham, to recover damages in the sum of $50,000 for personal injuries suffered by his child, Wanda Louise Rainboldt, and $S,000 doctors, medicine, and hospital hills which appellee, I. N. Rainboldt, alleged he had become obligated to and had in part paid. The cause was tried to a jury, submitted on fifty-four special issues, and resulted in judgment being entered for the child for…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Shannon v. Western Indemnity Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Waller v. LilesTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. v. OwenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  5. Massie v. HutchesonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Schroeder v. RainboldtTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Gulf Refining Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Dr. Pepper Bottling Co. v. Rain-BoldtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Wilson v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API