Legal Opinion

Lilienthal v. Kaufman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1964Published

1Opinion of the Court

239 Or. 1 (1964)

395 P.2d 543

LILIENTHAL

v.

KAUFMAN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 30, 1964.

Reargued June 30, 1964.

Affirmed September 30, 1964.

Petition for rehearing denied November 4, 1964.

Cleveland C. Cory, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was George H. Fraser, Portland.

Louis Schnitzer, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.

Before ROSSMAN, Presiding Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

DENECKE, J.

This is an action to collect two promissory notes. The defense is that the defendant maker has…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Loucks v. . Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Kievit v. Loyal Protective Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API