Ploof v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Chief Justice.
A jury convicted Gary Ploof of Murder in the First Degree for killing his wife and a Superior Court judge sentenced him to death. Ploof raises five arguments in this direct appeal. His most compelling argument, one of first impression in Delaware, involves claims of procedural and substantive constitutional defects in Delaware’s sentencing scheme resulting from the trial judge’s refusal to bifurcate Ploofs penalty hearing. After carefully reviewing Ploofs contentions, we find no constitutional deficiency in Delaware’s sentencing framework, no abuse of discretion or legal…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ploof v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Ortiz v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Ploof v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.