Legal Opinion

May v. Clanton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1922No. 8 Div. 488PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Plaintiff (appellee) stated his cause of action in several different counts. Pie sought to recover of the sheriff and his official bondsmen damages for taking an automobile, the property of plaintiff, under process against the Home Steam Laundry. ' This process, an execution, had issued in a cause entitled PI. & O. Reno, a partnership composed of Harry D. and Harry O. Reno, versus Home Steam Laundry; defendant in that cause not being otherwise described in the summons and complaint or judgment. The service in that cause was shown by tbe sheriff’s return indorsed on the summons as follows:

“I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ferrell v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. Tarleton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Carlisle v. Peoples BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Wahouma Drug Co. v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. National Life Accident Ins. Co. v. SaffoldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Harbison Walker Refractories Co. v. HatcherAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Jerry Martin & Associates, Inc. v. Don's Westland BulkMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Jerry Martin & Associates, Inc. v. Don's Westland BulkMontana Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API