Legal Opinion

Seaboard Nat. Bank v. Rogers Milk Products Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 13, 1926No. 49PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PEE CURIAM.

A reversal of the order , would affect the rights of all the distributees under its terms. They are necessary parties to the appeal, and the receivers do not represent them. The appellant’s fund was already depleted by the earlier order making allowances. It may be too late on this appeal to disturb those payments, but if the appellant means to press his assignment of error for failure to pay the whole proceeds to him, on the theory that the District Court had no jurisdiction to award allowances out of property which was never a part of the defendant’s assets, the parties receiving…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. PendletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Browning v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Speers Sand & Clay Works, Inc. v. American Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API