Legal Opinion

Mercantile Bank of Kansas City v. United States

District Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided June 21, 1994No. 90-0781-CV-W-9PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO COUNT I OF THE COUNTERCLAIM

BARTLETT, District Judge.

This case comes before the court on cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, Mercantile Bank of Kansas City, James P. Goetz and William P. Messer, move for summary judgment on both plaintiffs’ Complaint and on Count I of defendant’s Counterclaim and for partial summary judgment on Count II of defendant’s Counterclaim. Plaintiffs in their Complaint seek recovery of employment and withholding taxes…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Slodov v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MosbruckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1998
  2. Freeland v. Internal Revenue Service (In re White Trailer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API