Legal Opinion

Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. Young

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided August 30, 1985No. 64140PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

475 So.2d 221 (1985)

OPPENHEIMER & CO., INC., Petitioner,

v.

Marcia YOUNG, Respondent.

No. 64140.

Supreme Court of Florida.

August 30, 1985.

Stanley A. Beiley, Richard E. Brodsky and David S. Garbett of Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper, Miami, for petitioner.

Mercedes C. Busto of Bailey & Dawes, Miami, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The United States Supreme Court has entered an order[*] vacating Oppenheimer & Co. v. Young, 456 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 1984), and remanding the cause for further consideration in light of Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Byrd, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 1238, 84 L.Ed.2d 158 (1985). We have…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. A. Lamar BYRD, Appellee, v. DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. v. YoungSupreme Court of Florida · 1984

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hirshenson v. SpaccioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  2. Aztec Medical Services, Inc. v. BurgerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Finn v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Wieneke v. Raymond, James & Assoc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  5. Puchner v. Drexel Burnham LambertDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API