Legal Opinion
Pichler v. UNITE
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 2006No. Civil Action 04-2841PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
Before us now is plaintiffs’ motion to amend the August 30, 2006 Judgment (the “Judgment”), and the parties’ briefs on this matter, filed pursuant to our Order of September 20, 2006, wherein we instructed them to address various issues concerning remedies.
I. Background
On August 30, 2006, we held that UNITE HERE (“UNITE”) had violated the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act of 1994 (“DPPA” or the “Act”), and therefore granted judgment in favor of the named plaintiffs and against UNITE as to liability. See Pichler v. UNITE, 446 F.Supp.2d 353 (E.D.Pa.2006). We also…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- James Kehoe v. Fidelity Federal Bank & TrustCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Clingerman v. SadowskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Pichler v. UNITEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Sussex Drug Products v. Kanasco, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Pichler v. UNITEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Pichler v. UNITEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.