Legal Opinion
Pichler v. UNITE
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 13, 2009No. 08-2354PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McKEE, Circuit Judge.
The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (“NRTW”) appeals the district court’s order denying its motion to modify a protective order that restricts access to certain records. For the reasons that follow, we will affirm.
I. Factual Background.
In the fall of 2002, the Union of Needle-trades, Industrial & Textile Employees AFL-CIO (“UNITE”) 1 decided to launch a union organizing campaign targeting CINTAS Corporation, the largest domestic employer in the industrial laundry industry. CINTAS employs approximately 28,-000 people at 350 locations in the United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- John A. Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg Harold A. Bentzoni Kathryn Mikels John W. Osborne, II William Reber Mary Jean Knapik Maryann West Kowalshyn Richard F. Osswald Carl R. Rogers v. Ottaway Newspapers, Inc. T/a Pocono Record, Ronald F. Bouchard Pennsylvania Newspaper Publishers Association, Intervenors/appellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Focus v. Allegheny County Court Of Common PleasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Pichler v. UNITECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Young v. West Publishing Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
- Bailey v. DanielsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2009
- American Resort Development As v. Government of the Virgin IslanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. v. UNITESupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- SALYERS v. A.J. BLOSENSKI, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025