Fulweiler v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Appeal by defendant from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Defendant claims that the evidence shows as a matter of law that plaintiff ivas guilty of contributory negligence.
The accident happened at a street intersection on the evening of November 10,1928; hence after dark. The intersection was brightly lighted by lights at an oil station and a street light. What the condition was as to lights along the streets away from the intersection is not shown. Plaintiff was driving southerly on Concord street, a paved street in South St. Paul. According to his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dohm v. R. N. Cardozo BrotherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Sorenson v. SandersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Klare v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Day v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Simeon v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954