Legal Opinion
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 1, 1991No. 88-9752PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDWIN E. NAYTHONS, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Inc. and Armour Pharmaceutical Company as well as fourth-party plaintiff Revlon, Inc. (collectively, the policyholders) have filed their Motion to Compel seeking information concerning the insurers’ reinsurance for the claims made in the underlying AIDS-related litigation, and the reserves which the insurers have set for the underlying claims, all of which are now being withheld *611on grounds of irrelevance, burden, privilege and confidentiality.
The policyholders have requested information and documents…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Consejo de Titulares del Condominio Parques de Cupey y otros v. Triple-S Propiedad, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2025
- PECO Energy Co. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Nicholas v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2006
- Frazier v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Westfield Insurance Co. v. Icon Legacy Custom Modular HomesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.