Legal Opinion

Schertel v. Rex

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 6, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-7997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HUYETT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Mark and Marie Schertel brought this action under section 1983 of the Civil Rights Act alleging that defendants took their property without just compensation and due process. Defendants, Lynn Township and three of its supervisors, filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, I shall grant defendants’ motion.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

In resolving a motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true all the well-pleaded allegations of the complaint, construe the complaint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Helstoski v. GoldsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. Collier v. City of SpringdaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glendon Energy Co. v. Borough of GlendonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Baranowski v. Borough of PalmyraDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API