Hill v. Goodrich
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Habeas . Corpus, before Ellsworth, in chambers, September 24, 1858. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtEllsworth, J.
There are questions of fact to be decided on which the questions of law arise. Eirst to dispose of these.
It is claimed on the part of the petitioner that he was decoyed from Boston, in the state of Massachusetts, where he resides, to the city of Hartford; and that he was so decoyed by pretenses which are admitted to have been false, namely, by means of two anonymous letters informing Mm that a Mr. Sanford at Hartford had something of interest for him to know, which would be communicated to him if he came on. On the part of the plamtiff in the attachment, and those connected with the…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Scott v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Moletor v. SinnenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Siro v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- In re LagraveNew York Supreme Court · 1873
- Paine v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.