Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1912PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This is a case of original jurisdiction. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, C. J.

— Respondents, by leave of court, filed the following amendment to the return as set out in the statement to the former opinion herein:

“The respondents, by leave of the Court first had and obtained, amend their return heretofore filed as follows:

Amend paragraph 8 so that it shall read as follows:

‘8. That the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company has operated and managed its roads lying in the State of Florida, including the line between Pensacola and River Junction, with the utmost economy, consistent with the safety and despatch of its passengers, and with the safe and prompt handling of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. LouisvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Pensacola & Atlantic Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Railroad CommissionersSupreme Court of Florida · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. R. R. Comm'rs v. S. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  4. State ex rel. Burr v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1925
  5. State ex rel. Railroad Commissioners v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API