Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 1955No. 1616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Paul Mitchell was convicted of being a vagrant. His sole contention on appeal is that the evidence introduced by the Government, considered in the light of Beail v. District of Columbia, 1 was insufficient to warrant a finding of guilt.

Code section 22-3302 declares that certain classes of persons shall be deemed vagrants. Among those classes are: “(8) Any person who wanders about the streets at late or unusual hours of the night without any visible or lawful business and not giving a good account of himself.”

Various police officers testified that the defendant was seen…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beail v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Barnard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Coley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API