Mitchell v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Paul Mitchell was convicted of being a vagrant. His sole contention on appeal is that the evidence introduced by the Government, considered in the light of Beail v. District of Columbia, 1 was insufficient to warrant a finding of guilt.
Code section 22-3302 declares that certain classes of persons shall be deemed vagrants. Among those classes are: “(8) Any person who wanders about the streets at late or unusual hours of the night without any visible or lawful business and not giving a good account of himself.”
Various police officers testified that the defendant was seen…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beail v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harris v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Barnard v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Coley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1962