Legal Opinion

Banercraft Clothing Company, Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, Astro Communication Laboratory, a Division of Aiken Industries, Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board, David B. Lilly Co., Inc. v. The Renegotiation Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided July 6, 1972No. 24778PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

466 F.2d 345

151 U.S.App.D.C. 174

BANERCRAFT CLOTHING COMPANY, Inc.

v.

The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.

ASTRO COMMUNICATION LABORATORY, A Division of Aiken Industries, Inc.

v.

The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.

DAVID B. LILLY CO., Inc. et al.

v.

The RENEGOTIATION BOARD, Appellant.

Nos. 24685, 24778 and 71-1025.

United States Court of Appeals,

District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued March 9, 1972

Decided July 6, 1972.

Mr. William D. Appler, Atty., Dept. of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. L. Patrick Gray, III and Messrs. Thomas A. Flannery, U. S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Walter H.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Sears, Roebuck And Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  3. Production Molded Plastics, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API