Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Nance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2008No. 2007-2361PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Donald Nance of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0034086, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1979. The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that we suspend respondent’s license to practice for six months, with the suspension to be stayed on remedial conditions, based on findings that he misused his client trust account. We agree that respondent violated the Code of Professional Responsibility as found by the board and that a six-month suspension, all stayed, is appropriate.

{¶ 2} Relator, Cuyahoga County Bar Association, charged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Halliburton-CohenOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DoellmanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. VivyanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. DockryOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. NewcomerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. NanceOhio Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API