Legal Opinion
United States v. Lucido
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 22, 1974No. Crim. 49234PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREEMAN, District Judge.
The nine defendants in this case were charged in a two-count indictment filed June 14, 1973 with violating 18 U.S.C. § 1955 and conspiracy to violate that section, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. 18 U.S.C. § 1955 provides that “(w)hoever conducts, finances, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of an illegal gambling business shall be fined not more than $20,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.” The three motions now before the court seek to suppress a wiretap order dated May 8, 1972 and an extension order of June 5, 1972 and the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- United States v. Richard Becker and Jack EisenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Joseph E. Cafero A/K/A Ernie, in No. 72-1577 Appeal of Dominick Vinciguerra, A/K/A Dom, in No. 72-1578Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hernández Agosto v. López NievesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1983
- United States v. Michael PellicciCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- United States v. GuzekCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. FinaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- State v. SidotiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.