People v. Glass
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDoran, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment following a verdict of guilty by the jury.
The record reveals that the officers entered appellant’s home and found narcotics on the person of appellant.
It is contended on appeal that, “The verdict is contrary to law” and, that the “trial court committed error by advising the jury that the district attorney and counsel for appellant could stipulate to the admission of hearsay testimony, the content of which was highly prejudicial to appellant.”
The contention relates to the action of the trial judge which as recited in appellant’s brief, is as follows:
“A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. AhsbahsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. StriderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- People v. Fernandez CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021