Legal Opinion

State v. Blood

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 18, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.

This is an indictment for murder. A jury-in the superior court found the defendant guilty of murder in- the second degree. His motion for a new trial was heard and denied by the trial justice. The case is before us on defendant’s exception to this ruling, on his exception^ to numerous rulings made by the trial justice in the course of the trial, and on certain exceptions to the charge.

The state relies entirely on circumstantial evidence to establish the guilt of the defendant. Its theory is that, on September 5, 1940, the defendant, with malice aforethought, inflicted certain injuries upon…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KluskaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Commonwealth v. DeitrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. State v. SchweitzerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1889
  5. Commonwealth v. LockettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. RoddySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  2. State v. FranklinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. State v. MurphySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
  4. State v. MontellaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1959
  5. State v. AurgemmaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API