Bell v. Marsh
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial.
The action was upon a promissory note. The answer denied that the sum named in the complaint, or any other sum, was due or unpaid on the note, and for a second defense, and by way of counterclaim, averred that defendant was induced to execute and deliver the note by certain false and fraudulent representations. Defendant asked for affirmative relief. The case was tried before,a jury upon special issues framed and submitted by the court, and the verdict was rendered and filed on the seventh day of May, 1887.
All of the issues…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Warring v. FreearCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Bates v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by13 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Byrne v. McKeachieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Reclamation District No. 556 v. ThisbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Reiner v. SchroederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.