Legal Opinion

Casey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 24, 2010No. Case CV F 08-1811 LJO DLBPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff MayeVern Casey (“Casey”) seeks to recover life insurance benefits following the death of her ex-spouse, Billy Claborn, under a group life insurance policy issued by defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”). The parties filed cross motions for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

A. The Group Universal Life Policy

In November of 1991, Casey was an employee of GTE, Corp. She enrolled in a Group…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wallis v. Centennial InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
  2. Abbit v. ING USA Annuity & Life Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
  3. (HC) Solomon v. CovelloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Acceptance Casualty Insurance Company v. MRVK Hospitality Group Limited Liability CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API